Children and Family Relationships Act 2015

 

This Act has overhauled family law to update provisions in relation to guardianship, custody, and access to children, and in relation to adoption, IVF and other types of assisted human reproduction. The Act does not deal with surrogacy.

The Act will be commenced in stages in the coming months. A number of changes which will be put in place are set out below:

  • A father is a guardian of a child where he is a parent who is married or in a civil partnership. Where an unmarried father is a parent and has been living with the mother for a minimum of 12 months (after the Act comes into operation), including 3 consecutive months after the child’s birth, he will automatically be a guardian of the child. An unmarried father can be appointed a guardian by a Court or where the mother agrees to the appointment of the father as a guardian and a statutory declaration is signed to this effect, or where he has rights and responsibilities equivalent to guardianship under the law of another State. This is a significant development as there was previously no automatic right of guardianship for unmarried fathers in Ireland.
  • A father of a child includes a male adopter but does not include an unmarried father who is not a guardian of a child under the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964.
  • The best interests of the child are paramount in relation to guardianship, access or custody of a child. A Court will now take into account the views of the child, and has powers to appoint an expert to inform the Court of the child’s views, on behalf of the child.
  • For the first time a Court can appoint a guardian who is not a parent who has been living with a parent of the child for more than 3 years and shared responsibility of the child day to day for more than two years. The Court can also appoint a person a guardian who is providing the child’s day to daycare for more than 12 months continuously, where the child has no parent or guardian who is willing or able to be a guardian. This type of guardian may have rights which are limited by Court order.
  • A temporary guardian can be appointed for a child if a guardian is incapable of acting due to illness or injury. Guardianship continues until the guardian dies, child reaches 18 or marries. Guardians can be removed by a Court.
  • Relatives seeking access to a child no longer have to seek leave to obtain access from a Court.
  • Relatives and persons in loco parentis can apply for custody of a child.
  • A parent or guardian who has been unreasonably denied access or custody by another parent may apply to court for an Enforcement Order which is a “fast-track” procedure to make sure the parties comply with the Court Orders in place and can provide for the expenses of the party who has been unreasonably denied access or custody.

This is a summary of recent changes to guardianship, custody and access under the Children and Family Relationships Act 2015 which will shortly be in place.

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this article, it has been provided for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Amorys Solicitors is a boutique commercial and private client law firm in Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland.
For further information and advice in relation to “Children and Family Relationships Act 2015”, please contact Deirdre Farrell, partner, Amorys Solicitors deirdre@amoryssolicitors.com, telephone 01 213 5940 or your usual contact at Amorys.

Transgender Recognition in Ireland

“A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step” 
Lao Tzu, Chinese Philosopher (604BC – 531BC)

Gender reassignment is not yet recognised in Ireland but is recognised in every other member state of the European Union.  This has lead to a somewhat bizarre situation where the Irish authorities will recognise the acquired gender of a transgender EU national but not that of a transgender Irish national.

In 2011 the Irish Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages registered a civil partnership between a transgender woman EU national and her female partner.  The reason the Registrar allowed the registration of this civil partnership was because, under EU law, a member state (including Ireland) is obliged to accept an applicant’s nationality as determined by his/her state of origin.

At the time of writing it has been in excess of twenty years since Dr Lydia Foy, a transgender woman (who is also a qualified dentist) first sought legal recognition of her acquired gender as a female from the then Registrar of Births in 1993.  In 2007 the High Court made a declaration in the case of Foy -v- An t-Ard Chláraitheoir & Ors that the lack of legal recognition of an individual’s acquired gender breaches Ireland’s obligations under the European Convention on Human rights Act 2003.

Despite this High Court declaration nearly six years ago no draft legislation has been published to date.  In 2011 shortly after taking office, the Minister for Social Protection Joan Burton assured interested parties that the heads of a bill would be published in 2012 however there is still no sign of a bill.  It has been suggested by commentators that this delay is because further research into the impact of any proposed legislation on the institution of marriage and the family in Ireland is required.

In March of this year (2013) it emerged that Dr Foy has issued new proceedings in the High Court against the Minister for Social Protection and the State seeking either an order compelling the Minister and the State to publish legislation on foot of the 2007 High Court declaration or, in the alternative, a declaration that the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 is void and has no practical effect in Ireland.

If the Court is forced to make a decision in this case it will be interesting to see how the judgment respects the doctrine of the separation of the three powers of the State; the legislative, executive and judicial.  The judicial arm of the State does not have the power to initiate legislation as that is the function of the legislative arm – the Dail and the Seanad. However, the judiciary is responsible for upholding the fundamental rights conferred on citizens by the Constitution (including one’s right to marry, equality, dignity and one’s identity) and ensuring that these rights have a practical effect. However, given the backlog in the courts’ system, we may have to wait for some considerable time before a decision is made.

Dr Foy’s case is unlikely to be heard for at least 2 years and maybe longer and she will inevitably encounter many more legal obstacles on route to a hearing in the High Court.  One must wonder how many steps remain in Dr Foy’s thousand-mile journey.

Update

Amorys Solicitors are delighted to hear that Dr Foy settled her long drawn out case against the State last Tuesday, 28th October 2014 on the basis of the State telling the Court it was the “expressed intention” of the Government to secure the enactment into law of the Gender Recognition Bill 2014, which would enable Dr Foy to get the certificate.

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this article, it has been provided for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Amorys Solicitors is a boutique commercial and private client law firm in Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland.
For further information and advice in relation to “Transgender Recognition in Ireland”, please contact Deirdre Farrell, partner, Amorys Solicitors deirdre@amoryssolicitors.com, telephone 01 213 5940 or your usual contact at Amorys.

Homeowners Threatened With Legal Proceedings For Developer’s Failure To Pay Financial Contributions

Wicklow County Council (WCC) is pursuing 24 homeowners at Meadow Brook estate in Avoca for unpaid financial contributions required by the planning permission that approved the estate development. A financial contribution is a condition in a planning permission that requires the payment of a sum calculated pursuant to that local authority’s Development Contribution Scheme.  The payment is designed to compensate the local authority for the benefit that a proposed development would gain from using the roads, services and sewerage facilities within that local authority area.

Financial contributions imposed as a condition of planning permission are generally required to be paid prior to the commencement of construction work. However, agreements can be reached between the developer and the planning authorities for phased payment of the financial contributions but they generally include a considerable upfront payment. In the past, such agreements had the effect of enabling the developer to sell properties without having to discharge the full amount of financial contributions. Serious problems have now arisen for local authorities where developers have become insolvent leaving the issue of unpaid financial contributions outstanding.

Failure to pay a financial contribution means that the planning permission has not been complied with.  Failure to comply with a condition in planning permission affords a local authority grounds to serve an enforcement notice which in some cases could lead to the demolition of a property. However, there is no express legal provision which would entitle a local authority to recover unpaid financial contributions from the developer’s successor in title.  Planning legislation is unclear as to where the ultimate liability lies: is it on the property or on the developer to whom the planning permission was granted?

WCC is of the opinion that unpaid planning contributions are a charge on the property itself and not on the developer and has issued letters of demand to a number of the homeowners of the Meadow Brook estate for a portion of the unpaid financial contribution. The total amount claimed by WCC is just over €65,000.00 in total.

The issue of unpaid financial contributions is a matter for each local authority. Financial contributions are a source of significant funding for local authorities and given that there are reportedly €300 million in unpaid financial contributions in respect of planning permissions nationwide it is likely that WCC will not be the only local authority adopting this approach in such circumstances.

Dublin City Council has however recently stated that its policy is not to pursue householders.  Both Dun Laoghaire Rathdown and Fingal County Council are reported to have stated that they were unable to be definitive about their approaches to the issue. However whether or not local authorities adopt a policy of pursuing home and property owners the problem is likely to rear its head on a sale or remortgage when a purchaser or his solicitor will immediately seek clarity from the local authority concerned.

Given the history of insolvent developers in the Sandyford and surrounding areas local home and property owners may not be immune to this problem.

The precise legal basis for the actions of WCC in issuing these letters of demand to the homeowners of the Meadow Brook estate is unclear and may soon become the subject of a test case.  The matter may well have broader implications for all property owners both residential and commercial in circumstances where financial contributions remain unpaid.

The outcome of this move by WCC will be awaited with great interest by property owners, investors, lawyers, banks and insolvency practitioners.

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this article, it has been provided for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Amorys Solicitors is a boutique commercial and private client law firm in Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland.
For further information and advice in relation to “Homeowners Threatened With Legal Proceedings For Developer’s Failure To Pay Financial Contributions”, please contact Deirdre Farrell, partner, Amorys Solicitors deirdre@amoryssolicitors.com, telephone 01 213 5940 or your usual contact at Amorys.

Pin It on Pinterest